+1 123 456 7890 instantessays65@gmail.com

(answered) – 1 Running Header: DRAFT OF PERSONAL REFLECTION PAPER Draft of

$11.00

(answered) – 1 Running Header: DRAFT OF PERSONAL REFLECTION PAPER Draft ofDescriptionSolution downloadThe QuestionHello QuickTutor can you work on this paper if you have time? I provided some extra information and an example of the paper needed for this assignment that may be useful. If you need any more information, please let me know.PHI2100-Personal Reflection Paper -800-words written in your own words please-Para-3-4 lines DUE DATE-MARCH 8TH, 2016.BOOKSalmon, M. H. (2013). Introduction to logic and critical thinking (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth. ISBN: 9781133049753.By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:Personal Reflection Paper-The course from the readings, covers the fundamental principles of inductive/deductive logic and how to use critical thinking when sorting the validity of information used in drawing a valid conclusion. Including examples of common fallacies, recognizing fallacies, Inductive&deductive argument, fallacies common to causal argument, decision theory in a business, hypothesis confirmation, confirming hypothesis, standard deductive, language of argument, ambiguities & Unambiguous Language, Evidence to Support an Assertion, and Structure and Content of Arguments. Please see attached example of final paper.By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:Competency 1: Draw a valid conclusion.Identify the critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions with a supporting example.Competency 2: Analyze an argument.Identify the critical success factors using clear, unambiguous language with a supporting example.Competency 3: Assess the value of information.Identify the critical success factors in distinguishing deduction from induction with a supporting example.Competency 4: Communicate effectively in a variety of formats.Write coherently to support a central idea in appropriate format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.Review the rough outline draft you submitted in Unit 2 and the draft submitted in Unit 8. For your final draft, draw from the material covered in Units 1?9 and illustrate what you learned through examples that are applicable to both your personal and professional lives. SEE ATTACHED EXAMPLE OF SUBMITTED DRAFT ON UNIT 2Submit your personal reflection paper at the end of this unit. Refer to the Personal Reflection Paper course project description for additional information.Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click on the linked resources for helpful writing information. BELOW IS THE FEEDBACK FROM INSTRUCTOR ON UNIT 2 DRAFT;Problem with assignment on uint 1-3NoYesCommentsOutline critical success factors in drawing valid conclusions.(33%)[Competency]Outline critical success factors in analyzing arguments.(33%)[Competency]Outline critical success factors in distinguishing deduction from induction.(34%)[Competency]Overall CommentsThis paper looks really good. The only problem I see is with your account, of the difference between deductive and inductive arguments. Look back at the text (and/or any online resources) for details, but the basic difference lies in the strength of the inferential link between premises and conclusion. Deductive arguments strive to support their conclusions with certainty. For example, if it’s true that all ducks love water, and also true than Albert is a duck, then it follows with absolute necessity that Albert loves water. Inductive arguments strive only for probability in the truth of the conclusion. For example, if most ducks love water, and Albert is a duck, then it’s probably (but not necessarily true) that Albert loves water. Let me