Please see attachments.rubricCriteriaFar Above StandardsAbove StandardsMeets StandardsBelow StandardsWell Below StandardsCriterion ScoreStakeholder Identification Identification of a logical stakeholder based on the case study Generally, 1 point per stakeholder10 points9-10 Points10 stakeholders correctly identified a derived from the case study.8.5 points8.5 Points10 stakeholders correctly identified from the case study or logical assumptions.7.5 points7.5 PointsMinimum of 8 stakeholders correctly identified from the case study or logical assumptions.6.5 points6-7 PointsFewer than 8 stakeholders correctly identified from the case study or logical assumptions; and/or contains significant incorrect information.0 points0-5 PointsContent missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section./10To-Be Process Analysis Analysis describes how the system will support the new hiring process. Generally, 0-3 points per to-be process step. Both quantity and quality evaluated.30 points27-30 PointsTo-Be Process step improvements clearly relate to corresponding As-Is Process step and fully explain how the system will support it; demonstrates sophisticated analysis.25 points24-26 PointsTo-Be Process step improvements relate to corresponding As-Is Process step and explain how the system will support it; demonstrates effective analysis.22 points21-23 PointsTo-Be Process step improvements provided for each As-Is Process step and an explanation is provided for each19 points18-20 PointsFewer than 10 To-Be Process step improvements and/or explanations are provided; and/or contains significant incorrect information.0 points0-17 PointsContent missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section./30Business Benefits of Improved Process Explains how each step in the process can contribute to the overall business strategy. Generally, 0-2 point per improved process step. Both quantity and quality evaluated.20 points18-20 PointsBusiness benefits for all 10 process steps are fully explained; demonstrates sophisticated analysis.17 points16-17 PointsBusiness benefits for all 10 process steps are explained; demonstrates effective analysis.15 points14-15 PointsBusiness benefits for all 10 process steps are included.13 points12-13 PointsBusiness benefits for fewer than 10 process steps are provided; and/or contains significant incorrect information.0 points0-11 PointsContent missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section./20Expected Improvements Issues from case study and improvements due to technology in areas of Communication, Workflow, and Relationships. Generally, 0-7 points per area. Both quantity and quality evaluated.20 points18-20 PointsIssues and improvements for all 3 areas are fully and correctly explained; demonstrates sophisticated analysis.17 points16-17 PointsIssues and improvements for all 3 areas are explained; demonstrates effective analysis.15 points14-15 PointsIssues and improvements for all 3 areas are provided.13 points12-13 PointsIssues and improvements for fewer than 3 areas are provided; and/or contains significant incorrect information.0 points0-11 PointsContent missing or extremely incomplete, did not reflect the assignment instructions, showed little or no originality, demonstrated little effort, is not supported with information from the Case Study; and/or is not original work for this class section./20Research Two or more sources–one source from within the IFSM 300 course content and one external (other than the course materials)10 points9-10 PointsRequired resources are incorporated and used effectively. Sources used are relevant and timely and contribute strongly to the analysis. References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style8.5 points8.5 PointsAt least two sources are incorporated and are relevant and somewhat support the analysis. References are appropriately incorporated and cited using APA style7.5 points7.5 PointsOnly one resource is used and properly incorporated and/or reference(s) lack correct APA style.6.5 points6.5 PointsA source may be used, but is not properly incorporated or used, and/or is not effective or appropriate; and/or does not follow APA style for references and citations0 points0-5 PointsNo course content or external research incorporated; or reference listed is not cited within the text./10Format Uses outline format provided; includes Title Page and Reference Page10 points9-10 PointsWell organized and easy to read. Very few or no errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; double-spaced, written in third person and presented in a professional format.8.5 points8.5 PointsEffective organization; has few errors in sentence structure, grammar, and spelling; double-spaced, written in third person and presented in a professional format.7.5 points7.5 PointsSome organization; may have some errors in sentence structure, grammar and spelling. Report is double spaced and written in third person.6.5 points6.5 PointsNot well organized, and/or contains several grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or is not double-spaced and written in third person.0 points0-5 PointsExtremely poorly written, has many grammar and/or spelling errors, or does not convey the information./10Rubric Total ScoreTotal/100
The objective of this assignment is to enable you to demonstrate your understanding of federal and state court authority, structures, and functions. Write an
The objective of this assignment is to enable you to demonstrate your understanding of federal and state court authority, structures, and functions. Write an essay of 3-5 pages in which you respond to